top of page

Voters

The Candidate Transparency System (CTS) helps you explore candidates using verifiable information, not campaign messaging. This page explains how CTS works, what you’ll see on candidate profiles, and how to navigate evidence, verification, and transparency outputs.

The Standard of Verification

CTS bridges the gap between campaign rhetoric and institutional accountability. We provide a structured comparison of our verified standards versus traditional tracking methods.

Conventional Tracking
  • Spoken promises or written statements that are not independently verified.

  • Records that can be edited, removed, or deleted later without the public being told.

  • Scattered information often shared in partisan ways, which makes it harder to judge performance fairly.

The CTS Standard
  • Officially signed digital pledges, submitted and checked through a secure, nonpartisan online system.

  • A permanent data system that keeps every commitment in the public record for the entire time in office.

  • Verified, fact‑based transparency that cuts out rhetoric and focuses only on real legislative actions.

How to Read a Candidate Profile

Overview

Every candidate profile follows the same standardized structure so voters can easily understand what was disclosed and how it was verified, where applicable.

A. Candidate Profile Components

What CTS publishes on each profile:

  • verified documents

  • category scores with verification levels

  • overall CTS Transparency score

  • evidence timeline

  • audit logs

  • version history

Where applicable, each document includes:

  • verification level
  • metadata
  • timestamps
  • source information

What CTS does NOT publish:

  • personal data without appropriate redactions
  • confidential documents
  • narrative commentary
  • opinion
B. Category Scores

Scores reflect:

Rubric Scoring Table1.jpg
Rubric Scoring Table2.jpg
Rubric Scoring Table3.jpg
C. Overall Candidate Transparency Index (CTI) Transparency Score

A composite score showing how thoroughly and reliably the candidate documented their claims.

D. Evidence Timeline

A chronological record of:

  • submissions
  • updates
  • verification events
  • flags
  • appeals
E. Audit Logs & Version History

Every action is:

  • logged
  • timestamped
  • version‑locked
  • publicly visible

Behavioral Scoring

The CTS Behavioral Scoring system provides a neutral, data-verified measure of how closely a candidate's legislative actions align with their public pledges. We use a four-stage institutional process to ensure accuracy and nonpartisanship.

01
Verified Pledges

Candidates submit authenticated commitments via the CTS platform. Each pledge is timestamped and archived as a permanent record of intention.

02
Action Tracking

We integrate direct feeds from legislative registries to monitor floor votes, bill sponsorships, and official policy shifts relative to specific pledges.

03
Alignment Metrics

Our algorithms compare recorded actions against original commitments, identifying consistency, divergence, or policy evolution with neutral precision.

04
Accountability Score

The final Behavioral Score is published in the guide, providing a skimmable metric for voters to assess candidate reliability over time.

Explore Candidates

Use the dashboard to:

  • browse all participating candidates
  • filter by office, state, or category
  • view verified evidence
  • explore submissions &  transparency outputs​
  • read audit logs
  • review version history
  • compare side by side
  • demand candidate participation
bottom of page